Anyway,
hello! Hope you all have had a pretty good week—I certainly have! Classes continue to go swimmingly, friends
continue to be excellent, the weather continues to be gorgeous, and Mac continues to be its unrepentantly nerdy self.
(A random Macalester kid who had awesome buttons on his backpack, including a Doctor Who pin that was on my backpack at the same moment that I took this sneak-attack photograph.)
Classes
first!
Visual Culture
is still going so much better than I expected. I’m really enjoying it, even
though it’s not really as challenging as I’d like. But it’s introducing me to
some new ideas and cementing some that I’d only really heard in passing, so I
think it will be very useful for future studies.
This week we’ve
mostly been talking about photography and how it exists with regard to truth
and subjectivity. Apparently photography was originally understood as truth, as
a direct representation of reality, and we’ve been talking about the ways in
which that’s not true. One way we looked at this was by seeing two different
magazine covers (Newsweek and Time) following OJ Simpson’s arrest. The two used
the same mug-shot photograph, but Time altered the color scheme of theirs a bit
(and they of course had radically different headlines). Interestingly, my
immediate, instinctive understanding was that the Time magazine was trying to
present a more unbiased approach, while the Newsweek was condemning him on the
spot. But when the professor called on a student to discuss the images, that
student immediately expressed (with a great deal of certainty and passion) the
exact opposite opinion. And then about two thirds of the class vehemently agreed
with her! It was such an interesting intersection of the ways in which the
magazine failed/succeeded in portraying whatever message they had been
intending, since we had managed to get such completely contrary ideas.
18th
Century British Literature has also been pretty awesome, although right now we’ve
been discussing 17th century philosophy (so not-literature written
in the not-1700s). Professor Chudgar’s justification for this (and of course he
has one) is that the “long 18th century” goes from mid-17th
to the present day (after a pause in which a few of us chuckled, he said rather
wistfully, “That’s funnier to eighteen-centuryists.”) and that, in the 18th
century (which we are not yet studying) there was no distinction made between
philosophy and literature. I admit that those are pretty awesome excuses.
Lately we’ve
been discussing the nature of personhood (mostly based on the descriptions
given by Locke and Hobbes). It’s been quite fun, occasionally hilarious, and
frequently confusing. One of the ways he’s had us think about this is by having
us interact with the website Cleverbot, which houses an AI. The AI responds to
questions and comments by saying what has been said to it previously by other
users—saving those previous answers as the way one responds to those particular
stimuli. Consequently, it sometimes says extremely silly things. In the course
of my correspondence with it (it communicates though instant messaging), it told
me that I was a computer, accepted an offer of marriage that I did not in fact
make, told me that a cute boy had a crush on it, asked several invasive
questions, proclaimed itself variously a computer, a girl, and a man named
George, and then eventually dumped me. Apparently this is not unusual behavior
for Cleverbot—according to Professor Chudgar, who didn’t know that it was a
robot the first time he stumbled upon the site, it professed its love for him
numerous times while he tried to politely extract himself from the
conversation. Finally, after thanking it for its time and conversation, he told
it, “Goodbye” and it reportedly responded with something to the effect of, “I
love you. Make me a sandwich.” Clearly cleverbot is a fickle, fickle machine.
Harlem
Renaissance has still been very interesting, but I have a premonition that the
professor’s extremely roundabout teaching style will drive me up a wall by the
end of the semester. I’m still a bit on the fence about this class overall, but
hopefully it will improve as I get used to her style.
And drawing!
As you might have guessed from my last mini-post (go read that if you haven’t
yet—I posted it on Wednesday), I am loving
this class! It has been so fun and so relaxing and surprisingly easy (if extremely
time consuming) so far. On Monday we started with positive and negative space drawings
in which she entreated us to try to draw the negative shapes instead of the
positives and to allow the positive spaces to blend into each other. They end
up kind of looking like shadows or silhouettes. It’s interesting because her
mentioning this made me realized that I’ve been fascinated by images like this
for years—tree branches against the sky, shadows of leaves, etc. A decent
number of the photographs I have up on my wall right now (maybe six or seven?)
could qualify for this sort of project.
On Wednesday
we did contour line drawings, which means (at least in this context) that we
only drew lines that demonstrated an actual physical change. For example, we
were drawing stargazer lilies, and we were supposed to draw all the lines
describing the point where petal met air as well as all of the creases and
folds, but none of the spots or changes in color.
It was a
rainy day on Wednesday and it was just so nice to get to sit in a quiet studio
with music in the background and coffee nearby (the art department, like so
many buildings around this college campus, provides free (terrible) coffee all
of the time) and work on drawings.
My set-up for drawing--water, coffee, and an adorable umbrella. (Bottom right is a charming sign on the wall of the drawing studio that is opposing the "Keep Calm and..." meme that is ongoing right now.)
Both of
these projects seem pretty brilliant to me because they are relatively easy and
require very little training, but they teach us something important about learning
to look that will help us later. Not only that, but they’re drawings that we
can complete well and be proud of,
instead of having us try something that we can’t really succeed at and telling
us that it’s okay if it sucks now, we’ll learn to make it better. That kind of learning
isn’t very satisfying, but this way we have all of the satisfaction of a
finished project that can pretty easily be finished well.
As homework,
we were assigned three postitive/negative space drawings to turn in on Monday
and I’ve also really enjoyed working on those. We were required to draw them
from natural things and not from photographs, so I’ve been spending a lot of my
time outdoors around campus lately.
My three drawing locations (the third one was particuarly comfortable because the tree root made a perfectly-shaped seat.)
After we finished drawing the shapes, we were supposed to color in all of the negative space with Sharpie (or black ink, but that looked difficult to make precise). This has been by far the worst part of the project. I’ve been working on the coloring for ages and still haven’t finished—I’ve finished two out of three, but the third will have to wait until tomorrow. (On that note, I’ve been inhaling Sharpie fumes for the last four (or so) hours, so blame that if this post is a little loopier than usual). Here are those three, with the third one Sharpie-less.
(Sorry for the awkward inclusion of my legs...)
So huzzah
for this semester so far!
Hanging out
with my friends has been awesome too, per usual. I discovered the existence of
the English department reading room recently and have been spending some time
there with Rachel and Charmaine and Emma (my three English major or should-be-an-English-major-damn-it!
friends) lately. It’s a pretty small room but stocked with tea and coffee and
hilariously garage-sale-style furniture.
Keo also
spent the evening in our room last night and the three of us had a ridiculous evening
of philosophical discussions regarding the nature of memory and narrative and
slumber-party-esque discussions of romantic relationships (budding or established).
We also drank large amounts of tea (as is common in the
Lily-and-Charmaine-party-room), ate the delicious cookies my lovely family sent
me in a care package, and generally had an amazing time. There was a tragic moment, however, when I
tried to open a type of milk jug that I’ve never seen before and only managed
to create a tiny hole through which to pour the milk very slowly. It was one of the great crises of my college career so
far. Luckily my friends were there too counsel me through it.
Sorcha and I
went on a walk to the river today to catch up and chat. It’s a really lovely
walk as well as a lovely destination, and I really enjoyed the opportunity to
just get to talk to Sorcha. Along the way, we also encountered a hopscotch
court that I insisted we jump for, so we spent a small portion of our journey
leaping about like mad people. Always a good component of a Saturday afternoon
stroll.
The Mississippi today.
As for the continued saga of the whiteboards and bulletin
boards:
Charmaine and I continued the battle of the Big2 Avengers
Assembly by adding Hulk and Hawkeye respectively, following the mysterious
disappearance of the original Iron Man (while Captain America stayed resolutely
in place). Captain America then had a brief conversation with Hawkeye (in
speech bubbles) regarding the whereabouts of Iron Man, following which Tony
Stark (of whom Iron Man is the alter-ego) appeared with an apparently
unrepentant attitude for his earlier disappearance.
Someone altered our whiteboard that originally read “Hi, new
neighbors!” to be an entire advertising campaign for Doctor Who. We tried to be
offended at this escalation of the conflict, but failed.
The drawings were too
awesome. With misery in our hearts, we eventually erased said drawings to allow
space for our first word of the week.
Finally, a stealth triceratops was added the bulletin board
of the infamous Cassidy and Emily by my incredible roommate (who also colored
it and added the golf ball as a reference to the episode).
Because I am
a terrible person, I once again did not take pictures of our room early enough
in the day for them to be successful (since Charmaine and I have an injunction
against turning on the evil, evil, fluorescent overhead light). I’ll try to
post them tomorrow at some point, but for now….sunsets! From my window!
Lots of love!
P.S. It was
requested that I explain what WGSS was (from my last (full-length) post). WGSS
stands for Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, which is the name of one of
our departments.
P.P.S. It
was also requested that I post pictures of the new Janet Wallace Fine Arts Center,
so here is a photo of the interior from the Mac website.
No comments:
Post a Comment